Post Merger Integration: How Many People Do You Need in Each Function?

When two companies come together, the spotlight often lands on financial synergies, customer retention, and IT systems integration. But there’s one challenge that quietly determines whether the merger delivers value, which is figuring out how many people are required in each function.

Looking for functional benchmarks? Start your search

Rightsizing the organization isn’t just a cost exercise, it’s about ensuring that the new company has the right structure to operate efficiently and scale. After all, these are the people who will deliver the expected value for the merger in the first place.

Table of Contents

• The Headcount Puzzle After a Merger
• Why Headcount Benchmarking Matters in PMI
• How Many People Should You Have in Each Function?
• Function-by-Function Integration Process and Timing
• How Benchmarking Data Supports Integration Decisions
• Common Mistakes in PMI Workforce Planning
• From Insight to Action

The Headcount Puzzle After a Merger

Every merger brings duplication. Two finance teams, two HR systems, two marketing departments. The question isn’t just who to keep, but how to redesign the structure so it fits the future business. Headcount is one of the biggest drivers of synergy value, but cutting too deeply can hurt operations and morale. Getting it right means balancing efficiency with capability.

Merging two companies of a similar size demands a more nuanced approach than a simple acquisition or takeover of a smaller company. Furthermore, no two mergers are the same. So, it is critical to leverage data to understand how the new organization will compare to others of similar size and complexity - This is where headcount benchmarking comes in.

Why Headcount Benchmarking Matters in PMI

Headcount benchmarking gives you an external reference point for what “right sized” looks like. It helps leaders see whether their Finance, HR, or IT functions are overstaffed relative to industry norms. Benchmarks can reveal where duplication is inflating costs and where leaner operations are possible without sacrificing performance.

For example, if the merged entity’s Finance team accounts for 2.5% of total headcount while peers operate efficiently at 1.5%, there’s a clear signal that streamlining may be possible. The same applies to support functions like HR or Legal, where consolidation opportunities often hide in plain sight.

Benchmarks don’t dictate decisions, but they inform them. They provide an evidence base that can make tough calls more objective and defensible, especially when stakeholders question the rationale behind workforce changes.

How Many People Should You Have in Each Function?

There’s no universal answer, but there are data-driven ranges that help guide decision-making. After a merger, leaders often ask:

• How do I know if my Finance or HR teams are too large?
• What’s a healthy ratio of HR or Finance FTEs per 1,000 employees post-merger?
• Which functions usually offer the biggest synergy opportunities?

Here’s what the data often shows across support functions:

• Finance: Typically 1% – 3% of total headcount in large organizations.
• HR: Roughly 1% to 3%, depending on complexity and geography.
• IT: Often 2% to 5%, depending on the industry and level of in-house infrastructure.
• Legal and Compliance: Around 0.5%, varying with industry and regulatory intensity.
• Procurement: Usually 0.5% to 2%, depending on the degree of outsourcing.

These figures are general reference points only. The value lies in comparing your combined organization against relevant peers and understanding where functional overlaps or inefficiencies sit. Note that there can be significant variances in these figures depending on the industry, such as a software company having a much larger IT team. Always compare your organization to industry-specific benchmarks.

Search benchmarks for your industry, size, and geography

Function-by-Function Integration Process and Timing

Each function has a different role in integration. Some functions consolidate immediately, while others grow before they shrink. Understanding typical ratios can help to set realistic expectations.

Finance

Finance is often the first function to be rationalized. Post-merger, finance teams typically reduce headcount as systems and reporting lines consolidate.

HR

HR tends to be slower to integrate. Dual HRIS systems, legacy policies, and change management responsibilities often mean temporary headcount spikes before efficiency gains appear.

IT

Systems integration demand heavy IT personnel involvement. Merged companies may carry extra IT staff for six to twelve months while systems are migrated. Longer-term ratios settle once technology stacks are unified.

Legal, Marketing, and Procurement

These functions benefit most from overlap reduction. Benchmarking can show how many contract specialists or brand managers are typical for a company of your new scale, helping identify where consolidation makes sense.

How Benchmarking Data Supports Integration Decisions

Post-merger workforce planning involves more than just identifying redundancies. It’s about creating an organization that’s built for the future, which is often more ambitious than the past. Benchmarking helps to:

• Identify duplication: For example, two payroll teams or overlapping FP&A roles are prime targets for integration. There always needs to be a sensible transition plan in place, as de-duplicating critical roles too early causes chaos.
• Prioritize consolidation: Some functions deliver quick wins, while others require staged reduction.
• Support transparency: Benchmarking data gives leaders a defensible, objective way to explain workforce changes. This is especially important when getting buy in from senior stakeholders about key headcount decisions.
• Enable better design: Data reveals how functions can be restructured, not just reduced. This usually includes changes to the operating model for the larger post-merger organization to be successful.

The most effective integration teams use benchmarks as part of a broader decision-making framework. Numbers help to guide the discussion, but leadership make the final decisions.

Common Mistakes in PMI Workforce Planning

Even seasoned integration teams make missteps when it comes to headcount. Here are four common pitfalls:

1. Chasing arbitrary synergy targets without understanding how the functions worked in the pre-merger state.
2. Ignoring complexity differences such as global footprint, business model, or regulatory load.
3. Assuming headcount parity equals efficiency, when in reality, one organization might have invested more heavily in automation or shared services.
4. Underestimating change fatigue, which can erode productivity long before cost savings materialize.

Avoiding these mistakes means using data to challenge assumptions and focusing on building a sustainable, efficient organization rather than just hitting a short-term target.

From Insight to Action

Mergers succeed when leaders balance efficiency and capability. Headcount benchmarking provides the clarity needed to right-size each function based on data, not guesswork.

Before finalizing your integration plan, ask yourself: does your new structure reflect the scale, efficiency, and focus of your peers? The answer could determine whether your merger creates value or simply combines complexity.

Follow the data - Explore functional benchmarks today