

Looking for trusted HR benchmarks? Start your search

At its core, HR cost per employee measures how much your company spends on HR operations for every person in the business. It’s calculated by dividing total HR operating costs by the total number of employees (see section #3 for more detail). HR operating costs typically include:
What’s usually not included are company-wide costs like general payroll or non-HR benefits administration. In short, this metric gives you a clear snapshot of how much your organization invests to support, manage, and develop its people.
The HR cost per employee metric measures the cost effectiveness of your HR function. For company leaders, it provides visibility into how efficiently the team is structured and where resources are going. It also helps to assess whether HR investment levels are aligned with company size, strategy, and performance.
So, why should you benchmark your HR cost per employee? Here’s three common reasons:
It’s important to remember that lower isn’t necessarily better. When benchmarking it’s important to understand the context. For example, a company with a higher HR cost per employee may be investing in areas like leadership development, data analytics, or employee experience. These investments are designed to drive long-term productivity and retention, so they can be rationalized when benchmarks alone suggest inefficiency.
Formula:
HR Cost per Employee = Total HR Operating Costs / Total Number of Employees
Example calculation:
If your HR function costs $3 million a year and your company has 1,000 employees, your HR cost per employee is $3,000.
A few nuances to keep in mind:
Ready to benchmark your HR function? Get started here
These two metrics are often confused, but they measure different things outlined below:
A high HR cost per employee with a low HR to employee ratio could mean you’re investing in technology rather than headcount, which is a sign of a modern, automated HR model (especially with the rise of AI).
Conversely, a low HR cost per employee but high HR to employee ratio may suggest manual processes, limited system leverage or a high proportion of HR employees located in low cost countries (which is not necessarily a bad thing).
Used together, these metrics provide a balanced view of efficiency and capability.
Industry context is critical. What’s “normal” for one company may be very different for another organization. Our benchmarking data shows that HR cost per employee can vary widely depending on business model, workforce type, and regulation.
Here are some of the differences between industries:
Without benchmarking and a sound understanding of your company context, it’s impossible to tell whether your HR costs reflect strategic investment or inefficiency.
Once you’ve calculated your HR cost per employee, the real value comes from comparing it with external benchmarks.
Benchmarking shows how your HR spend stacks up against similar organizations in your industry, region, and size band. That comparison helps you:
At CompanySights, our benchmarking data helps HR and finance leaders understand how best-in-class organizations allocate HR resources for improved efficiency.

Tracking the HR cost per employee is one of the most effective ways to link HR activity to business performance. But it’s benchmarking that transforms it from a static number into a strategic insight. So, what are you waiting for?
Balance efficiency with impact – Search benchmarks now
Download a copy of our latest all industry report with data to benchmark the Finance, HR, IT and Marketing functions.
Insights are just around the corner.